What Can be Uttered in Cyberspace?
Required:
Fred Cate, Indecency, Ignorance and Intolerance: The First Amendment and the Regulation of Electronic Expression - SCP
a. obscenity
Required:
US v. Thomas (paras.46-69) - CCP
Discretionary:
EFF Amicus Brief on US v. Thomas case - CWP
b. patently offensive but non-obscene speech
Required:
Reno v. ACLU (Supreme Court Decision) - CCP
Discretionary:
Materials on proposed ratings systems and/or V-chip (e.g. the CYBERsitter critique)
Articles/information on blocking/filtering software
Filtering Sites
Articles on Library Censorware
c. harassing speech
Required:
Zeran v. AOL - CCP
US v. Alkhabaz - CCP
Discretionary:
US v. Baker - OYO
MacKinnon Amicus Brief - OYO
Any document out there related to gender harassment or the regulation of pornography (e.g., the Jake Baker home page and other materials, theYale web page on gender, the Cyberporn Debate page, etc.) - OYO
d. defaming speech
Required:
Smith v. California - CCP
Cubby v. Compuserve - CCP
Stratton Oakmont v. Prodigy - CCP
Discretionary:
Rindos v Hardwick - CWP
It's in the Cards v. Fuschetto - OYO
EFF's critique of Stratton Oakmont - OYO
Arnold-Moore, Legal Pitfalls in Cyberspace: Defamation in Computer Networks (Australian) - OYO
e. Right of Publicity/Anonymity
Required:
Stern v. Delphi Internet Services - CCP
ACLU of Georgia v. Miller - CCP
Discretionary:
Michael Froomkin, The Internet as a Source of Regulatory Arbitrage - OYO
Mark Lemley, Rights of Attribution and Integrity in On-Line Communications - OYO
Contents | Seattle University School of Law| Top